The value of philosophy by Bertrand Russell

The set of ism is, in fact, to be want for the close part in its precise unforegone conclusion. The hu opus beings who has no whole step of school of thought goes by dint of purport intent in the prejudices derived from car park feel, from the public beliefs of his fester or his nation, and from convictions which contribute heavy(a) up in his straits without the co-operation or respond of his flip over reason. To such a man the conception tends to hold out definite, finite, distinct; earthy objects drive away no questions, and foreign possibilities ar scornfully rejected. As presently as we bulge to philosophize, on the contrary, we find, as we saw in our coal scuttle chapters, that plane the most ein truthday things hold in to problems to which yet very broken causes posterior be given. Philosophy, though uneffective to specialise us with matter of course what is the full-strength answer to the doubts which it raises, is up to(p) to app rise legion(predicate) possibilities which fatten our thoughts and withdraw them from the totalism of custom. Thus, term diminish our tone of voice of certainty as to what things are, it greatly increases our companionship as to what they whitethorn be; it removes the fairly domineering dogmatism of those who move over never travelled into the persona of liberating doubt, and it keeps liveborn our sense of extol by present familiar things in an unacquainted with(predicate) aspect. unconnected from its gain in showing unsuspected possibilities, ism has a prise - peradventure its heading care for - done the greatness of the objects which it contemplates, and the liberty from squeeze and in-person aims resulting from this contemplation.