Cambridge Syllabus With Qns

There will be no avouchment specifically asking for examples it is assumed that they will form a internal part of the response. both(prenominal) questions will require specific reference to capital of Singapore and Singapore issues. The paper will consist of a mixture of necessitate questions and statements that be intended to kick up a response from the candidate. The latter should provoke thought, rather than just acceptance of the assertion. Whilst some questions may appear to digest a particularly topical flavor, this is the result of chance, not design, since questions be redact headspring in advance of the year in which any inclined examination is taken.Of course, candidates are able to make hire of such cloth for the purpose of relevant illustration, but any attempt to spot a presumable topic for a given year is unlikely to prove lend oneselfful. The form of the Questions The Principal Examiner submits a selection of proposed questions, covering a drift of to pic areas. These are then scrutinized by a panel of sr. Examiners / Moderators for comment / hinted changes or modifications. The purpose of this is to ensure balance and to avoid any possible misunderstanding Or ambiguity in the wording that could wrong candidates.The Principal Examiner reviews the first draft in the light of the to a higher place and submits a second version of the Paper which is discussed and finalized at a showd avouch with the Subject Officer and the Scrutinizers. All questions are equally weighted. There is no credit given to a response to a question solely beca phthisis it may be deemed more difficult. For the sake of rarity in the Paper, dissimilar wrangling / phrase are used as question prompts e. G Discuss, Do you agree? , To what extent, Is it fair? , How far? . There is little or no difference in the demands of the question depending on the prompt that is used.However, key words to note are always, never, every, all, and any other words that seem to suggest an extreme position, or one that offers no alternative view. This is a exceedingly unlikely situation and such words or phrases should be challenged. Some Thoughts on the work of English The Principal Examiners report for the past a couple of(prenominal) years has stressed the point hat Centers and Candidates appear to be well aware of the demands of the Paper, but that it is the quality of expression that is the clearest discriminator between scripts.The Reports assume also listed the recurrent nature of the problems to be found in weaker scripts. Essentially, these cogitate to a) subject / verb agreement b) confused and insecure use of tenses c) incorrect use of prepositions d) incorrect use of speech communication / common confusions e) certain recurrent Structures, especially Although Because . Candidates some sequences seem to rely on stock words and phrases. Whilst this can hang retain students, it can also detract from a sense of a confident personal voice.N othing can replace the experience of developing verbiage in context through broad reading of quality texts. Candidates are given credit for what is termed felicitous expression and examples of good vocabulary and phrasing are acknowledged with a tick in the text. This often acts as an indicator when assessing the Use of English mark that a script is approaching the top band. Nevertheless, this only applies if the use of such vocabulary forms part of an overall fluency in the writing. A simple style does not have to be simplistic.Poor control, leading to a breakdown in sentence structure, is the greatest reason for a distressing English mark. By simply varying sentence openings, and ensuring that economy of language is achieved, a good mark can be gained for use of English. The use of jargon, especially when addressing economic and social issues, has already been raised. These are not necessarily undesirable, as long as they are explained and form part of the candidates own indivi dual style. Introductions are very important and examiners are asked to make a brief comment on the Opening to each essay.An effective foundation shows an immediate awareness of the central issues of the question, defining any difficult words, or ones that require clear parameters for the purpose of the discussion. Often, however, candidates waste too much time in defining unnecessarily simple ideas, such as a school or a business. Of course, it is useful to give a brief invoice of the different types in each case, but there are occasion when an over-pedantic attempt at definition merely blurs the introduction, rather than clarifying the circumspection that the essay will aim to pursue.