Han China and Mauryan & Gupta India Essay

Han dynasty and Mauryan/Gupta empires authentic in roughly the same time frame and overlapped in the historic period 320 B. C. E. 220 C. E. developing in varied parts of the globes with their own unique geographies. some(prenominal) the Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed bureaucratic governments that were ruled by kings, but due to the different geographical regions, Indias government was fragmented into local governments. The Han Dynasty of China was organize off of a social philosophy while Mauryan/Gupta India followed a morality which united the subcontinent.The Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires also both developed agrarian economies although their view on the merchant mannikin were nearly opposite. The Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires both created hierarchical, bureaucratic governments. The hierarchy in Chinas government was more flexible and was set up in the 5 relationships (ruler and subject, father and son, husband and wife, oldest son and younger brothers, and booster shot and friend) whereas Indias hierarchy was rigid and created through the Caste System (Brahmin, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Sudras, and at last the Pariah).Ultimately, both hierarchical bureaucracies were led by a king. In China, the Han dynasty was adequate to create a strong centralized government led by kings who claimed the divine right to rule China, or in the case of the Chinese Dynasties, they claimed the Mandate of Heaven. However, because of the geography of India, such as the Deccan Plateau and the Hindu-Kush Mountains, the government of India was blue up into local governments.Whereas China needed a strong centralized government in order to unite its people, India could get away with having a weak central government because Hinduism would ultimately unite the people of the Mauryan/Gupta empires. Hinduism, the major righteousness of India which also kept the people of India united when the regional governments could not, was ground on the principle of a cycle of rebirt h known as samsara. Under this religion, the main focus of the people was to achieve moksha uniting with brahman and escaping samsara.And where the Mauryan/Gupta empires focused on otherworldly ideas, the Han Empire focused on life story on earth following the teachings of Confucius. Even though the Mauryan/Gupta empires followed a religion and the Han empire followed a philosophy, both the Mauryan/Gupta and Han empires believed in respecting their superiors. Finally, Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India both created prosperous, agrarian economies. However the Han Empire relied on the labor of wheat, rice, and silk and the Mauryan/Gupta Empire relied on the production of cotton.Both empires also relied on the use of conscripted labor but in Han China it was drafted labor and in Mauryan/Gupta India it was through the use of the pariah (untouchables) class from the Caste System of Hinduism. Even though their economies, in principle, are identical, they had immensely differing views o f the merchant class. In Han China, they were viewed as the mean people and scum of the human race whereas in India, they made up the Vaisyas caste which was their middle class.