Niccolo Machiavelli and the Modern World Research Paper

Niccolo Machiavelli and the Modern World - Research Paper faceIn the eighteenth century, his writings were physical exertiond to inspire a belief in the inevitability of ingrained change among revolutionaries (Baker 204-207). Following this revolutionary trend, Leon Trotsky said that Machiavelli was the semipolitical philosopher who generalized the experience of democratic revolutions (Trotsky 850). This image persists straight off Roger Boesche argues that Machiavelli was the greatest theorist of how popular government can defeat tyranny (Boesche 165). In 1513, he wrote his known work, The Prince, which has become one of the most influential books ever written in modern political philosophy. Benedetto Fontana asserts that Machiavellis new prince was to have forged a political and cultural alliance with the people, and thus initiate a rinnovazione renewal aiming at a new Italian state (Fontana 148). It had a dramatic impact on modern political thought. The Prince In The Prince , Machiavelli offered practical drawing cardship advice designed to keep a ruler in power, illustrating his ideas with practical, historical examples. He actively endorsed stratagems that would discourage mass discontent through the diversion of an opponents energies through such tactics, a leader could channel enemies efforts elsewhere. In this way, a leader could create conditions in which it would be disadvantageous for his opponents to try to convert him. Machiavelli believed that a leader would occasionally be called upon to make use of force however, he professed that force should that be exercised in response to dire circumstances. harmonize to Machiavelli, a good leader would be able-bodied to walk away from evil means when they were no wanter required. A leader would likewise earn from respecting the need for his subjects well being. In his discussion on the value of liberality, Machiavelli cautioned that a Prince should be liberal by maintaining the general welfare (8 6) Machiavelli realized that good fortune had a key relationship to restrained use of resources for the best overall effect. Leaders should be frugal, both in allocating resources to the military infrastructure that protects the state from international threat and in allocating funds to the political and economic infrastructure that promotes the welfare of the state. Once people regard that frugality is in their best interests, it will be linked to good fortune over the long term. The ability of a prince to act in his own best interests and the best interests of the people (even when, initially, they might non see his acts as desirable) requires that he not be governed exclusively by a rigid enrol of ethical standards. The ends, in some instances, could justify the means. Despite his overriding concern for the best interests of the ruler and the conservation of the state, Machiavelli professed that general ethical standards are desirable to maintain, when possible. Chapter 21 o f The Prince deals entirely with the value of a rulers positive reputation. According to Machiavelli, a prince needs to appear as a true friend and should show himself as a lover of merit by giving preferment to the able and honoring those who excel in every contrivance (112-113). Although Machiavelli did not claim that such standards are required for success, he did laud ethical leadership as a general guideline. Machiavellis innovation was that ethics were expendable. He outlined a series of circumstances and situations in which a leader might be forced to use violence to a degree that would be morally reprehensible in any normal