Knowledge Invented Or Discovered Philosophy Essay

Knowledge Invented Or observe Philosophy Es positThe meaning and difference between Discovered and Invented is the archetypal familiarity issue that comes up after reading the title. How do we categorise something as being discovered or invented? Are both finesses discoveries or both discoveries inventions?The word discovered means to gain association or aw arness of something non kn sustain to begin with, whereas invent means to create or produce something that did not exist ahead.The aras of knowledge ar mathematics, natural sciences, humankind sciences, history, arts and ethics. But due to the word limit constraints, it is difficult to charter all(prenominal) areas of knowledge into account. So, I will take 2 areas of knowledge and discuss them.First lets take history into account. The past is fixed unchange qualified and absolutely certain. Nothing we preempt do can change it. Therefore, we ca-ca up history as the model for truth and certainty. BUT This is what we think. We do not take into account the bigger spot of this. How can we be genuine what the historians tell us is right? How can we be sure that this is what definitely happened in the past?All the supra sayings tell us one thing that history is completely contrary from what we numerate it to be. This is because all historians research the past with certain interest or questions in their mind, calve out only the pieces that are relevant to their investigation, and assemble them in diametrical ways.All historians are selective and they select on the basis of their let paradigms. All historians are humans and their history is based on their own special(prenominal) interest, which plausibly are dependent on their own culture.For example, if we consider a circumstance where volume plant bombs maybe in an try out to force the government to make some changes according to their wishes now in this situation, I and probably most of the people will call it terrorism as it is ki lling innocent people. BUT, some people will probably call it freedom- fighting. This situation probably has arisen in history many times, alone as I said before, all historians will portray this situation according to what they deal. This obviously means that history is altered according to assorted historians. A proof of this maybe found in deuce different history books where one historian might ca-ca portrayed the above situation as terrorism and the other as freedom- fighting.So, the conclusion to all the above arguments leaves us with the belief that history is invented according to different historians, what they believe and what they think about the situation. BUT, as being a TOK student, the second side of the arguments also has to be explored.People say that history is constructed by slanting historians working with biased sources which are why at that place is no much(prenominal)(prenominal) thing as historical truth. But sound because their work is selective, it d oes not mean it is that they have twisted it. There might be some(prenominal) accounts of a particular event and none of it might be true, or there might be true pieces in each. The historian recognizes the problem, and looks to top them. They give explanations with developed reasons. Theories, arguments and accounts all examined and questioned.And plus, there is a pressing good need for us to acknowledge the reality of the past. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it Santayana.In conclusion for history, I think it cannot be characterized as either invented or discovered. I think, it is BOTH, invention AND discovery.The next area of knowledge I would discuss is mathematics. Maths- invented or discovered? This question has been debated on since a very long time exclusively till now, a particular conclusion has not yet been reached. Some people believe that maths was invented, while some believe that it was discovered. The problem that arises here is that people who say that maths is invented and people who say that maths is discovered both have reasonable evidences to prove themselves, which is why not even one can be proved wrong.The view that maths is out there waiting to be discovered is called the platonic view of maths, named after Plato, who thought that numeric truths are eternal and unchanging. For example, if we consider the Pythagoras theorem, of course it did not exist before as a theorem, except surely their truth values did exist. For instance, anyone who happened to kind second powers from the sides of a right angled triangle would find that the area of the square of the hypotenuse would equal the area of the other two squares combined. The name of Pythagoras theorem is definitely an invention, but the mathematical relationship obviously existed before it was discovered.But then again, there are some difficult questions raised in response to Platos theory, such as where did maths exist? How do we discover maths? l egion(predicate) believe that the only reasonable answers suggest that maths is purely in the mind. And Plato could probably not have argued on this because he had argued that we are just remembering things that we already knew but had forgotten. But if maths really is in the mind, then isnt it an invention?In counter argument to the above two questions, I can give an example. For example you are in a maths class and given a problem to solve. Has it never happened that you understand the problem without being provided with a system to solve it? Yes It has happened. At to the lowest degree with me it has. We were give a math question and not told a method of how to solve it. But surprisingly, a few students in the class got the assort answer. This means that the solution was found all the by those few students all by themselves. That solution existed which is why it occurred to the students and they solved it. This somehow proves Platos theory.Phi (Golden Ratio) as a mysterious n umber has been discovered in many areas, such as art, architectures, humans, and plants. According to the history of maths, Phi was first understood and apply by the ancient mathematician in Egypt, two to three thousand years ago, due to its browse appearance in Geometry. Phidias (500BC-432 BC), a Greek sculptor and mathematician, studied Phi and used the Phi in many designs of his sculptures, such as the statue of the goddess Athena in Athena, and the severalise of god Zeus in Olympiad. This means that the theorem of phi did exist before, and it was discovered but the name phi (golden ratio) was obviously invented. Same is the case with natural constants (e and ln), their values, properties and functions did exist before which discovered but their names and symbols were invented.In my opinion, like history, it is not consummate to characterize maths as either invented or discovered. It is both invention and discovery they work hand in hand. People think that there is an enormou s body of mathematical knowledge, partially discovered, and waiting patiently for people to come along and dig it out. Well, thats definitely fairly the case cypher is ever going to invent any maths that wasnt already true. I mean, no matter how hard you try, youre never going to be able to prove that 2+2=6. The concepts and theorems are discovered while the symbols are invented.In conclusion, I will say that I dont agree with the important claim that some areas of knowledge are discovered and others are invented. I think it is not accurate to say that some areas of knowledge are either invented or being discovered. In my opinion, they work hand in hand, together supporting a particular checkmate. Without either (discovery or invention), the subject remains incomplete, meaning that both are interdependent to complete a subject.